<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Menarik &#187; rogers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.menarik.co.uk/tag/rogers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.menarik.co.uk</link>
	<description>my kind of interesting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 21:11:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Distributed Cognition &#8211; IT has feelings too?</title>
		<link>http://www.menarik.co.uk/2009/01/distributed-cognition-tech-has-feelings-too/</link>
		<comments>http://www.menarik.co.uk/2009/01/distributed-cognition-tech-has-feelings-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Matthews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers Reviewed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rogers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarik.co.uk/?p=31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In which I discover the concept, coming from psychology and HCI, seeming to give equal rights to the inananimate]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="TF">ROGERS, Y. and ELLIS, J., 1994. Distributed cognition: an alternative framework for analysing and explaining collaborative working. <em>Journal of Information Technology (Routledge, Ltd.), </em><strong>9</strong>(2), pp. 119</span></p>
<div class="captionleft"><img alt="Image: Mary Hodder on Flickr" src="/wp-content/themes/tma/images/latest/thinkingmachines.jpg" title="THinking Machines" width="312" height="244" />
<p>Image:Mary Hodder, Flickr</p>
</div>
<p>My attention has just been drawn to the idea of distributed cognition, and in this paper, <a href="http://mcs.open.ac.uk/yr258/">Yvonne Rogers</a> introduces it as a multidisciplinary, unifying approach to understanding how people and media interact. The argument goes that it is not useful to abstract user and task as classic HCI theory does, but better to study  the system in situ as a whole. No one person or program has the full picture or full control, but together they achieve complex goals.  In this respect, the tech components can be seen to have a type of cognition, in that they embody &#8220;representational states&#8221;.</p>
<p>I was not wholly convinced by the use of the case studies in this paper to describe the approach (a technical support team and a hospital system), but will be following up the work of <a href="http://hci.ucsd.edu/hutchins/">Hutchins</a> in the early &#8211; mid 90&#8242;s, who first came up with the idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.menarik.co.uk/2009/01/distributed-cognition-tech-has-feelings-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
